myownbuddha

Nietzsche: You speak of becoming free. Suppose you knew with absolute certainty that nobody would ever know what you did, achieved, or failed to achieve. What would you still choose to do? Pushpendra: I would stop being anxious and defensive in arguments. I would stop hatred and jealousy. I would continue understanding philosophers, visiting new places, helping others through my work, connecting with nature, reading philosophy, meditating, and loving my family. Nietzsche: And why continue those things if nobody could admire you? Pushpendra: Because they make me free. I want to live each moment of life rather than live for recognition. Nietzsche: You say you want freedom. But perhaps these things are merely ways of escaping something within yourself. Pushpendra: My defensiveness is an obstacle to truth and to understanding the self. I don't want to protect an image of myself as knowledgeable or reasonable. I want to overcome the ego that makes me defensive even over small matt...

A girl, not older than nine or ten years, was looking out of the glass window of her air-conditioned train compartment. The train was speeding through the scorching heat of an Indian summer. As she watched the world passing by, her eyes suddenly stopped at the other train's coach in front of hers. "Dad," she asked innocently, "why are people sitting on the stairs of that train? Why are they not sitting inside?" Her father looked outside. It was the general coach, overcrowded with passengers. People were standing shoulder to shoulder. Some were hanging near the doors, while others sat on the metal steps, exposed to the burning sun and hot winds. The father replied immediately, "They cannot afford the ticket for an AC coach. They are poor and have not earned enough in their lives. My girl, you need to work hard so that you can enjoy the best that life has to offer and never face such situations." He continued, "You must study well, work hard in scho...

One of the most common defences of non-vegetarian food is framed as logic, not desire. It is often said: “If humans stop eating animals, they will continue to live and consume crops for their entire life, causing even more loss to the Earth.” At first glance, this sounds reasonable. But philosophy teaches us to slow down, examine assumptions, and ask: what is being taken for granted here? Argument 1: “Animals will keep eating crops if we don’t eat them” What it assumes: Animals exist independently of human demand as they keep on doing reproduction, and their consumption of crops is inevitable. What happens in reality: Farm animals are part of artificial breeding. They are selectively bred, artificially inseminated, and multiplied only because humans want meat, dairy, and eggs. If demand declines, farmers do not maintain the same number of animals indefinitely. Breeding reduces.  Male chicks are considered an unwanted byproduct of the egg industry and are killed shortly after hatc...

If we start observing closely to our day to day life then we will find that Human life is deeply intertwined with fear. While physical fear is necessary and is required to protect our life—such as escaping a predator or avoiding fire— psychological fear is of a different nature. It is not rooted in immediate physical threat, but in thought, memory, and imagination . To understand whether psychological fear can truly end, we must first understand how it arises.Why must we understand something before trying to escape it? Because one cannot truly avoid psychological fear without first seeing its roots clearly. If we try to push it away without real understanding, we only create inner conflict. Negating fear by sheer will—saying “I will not be afraid”—does not dissolve fear; it simply hides it temporarily. And whatever is suppressed returns with greater force, bringing anxiety, tension, and stress. Therefore, let us first inquire into the nature of psychological fear, observe how it begin...

Human life often moves between short-lived pleasures and deeper, lasting growth. Modern neuroscience and ancient philosophy both suggest something striking: the mind does not grow in a smooth, endless stream but in steps — like the quantum leaps that Max Planck discovered in physics more than a century ago. Planck’s Quantum Revolution: The Staircase of Energy In 1900, Max Planck showed that energy is not continuous but released in discrete packets called quanta. This idea solved the problem known as the “ultraviolet catastrophe,” where classical physics wrongly predicted infinite energy at higher frequencies. Instead, energy moves like a staircase: electrons jump from one level to another, releasing or absorbing light along the way. Niels Bohr extended this view, explaining that electrons exist in fixed energy levels . Stability in the universe comes because nature works in steps, not in chaos. "Energy is not infinite in its flow — it comes in steps, and so does hum...

The Destructive Nature of Thought History shows us a troubling pattern: human thought, when unchecked, often leads to destruction. Kings, conquerors, and even modern scientists have proven that mankind races toward power and knowledge with all its might, while morality usually arrives only after devastation has taken place. By then, regret is all that remains. The intoxication of ambition Ambition always feels noble at the start. It excites us, it inspires us, and it blinds us. Take Alexander the Great —his victories created vast empires, but also left behind countless corpses. Centuries later in Los Alamos , J. Robert Oppenheimer and his team felt the same thrill. Splitting the atom was not just science—it was adventure, fueled by the fear of Germany and the pride of discovery. The result, however, was the atomic bomb . This is how ambition works. We chase power, wealth, and knowledge, but rarely stop to ask: what will it cost? Look at the results today— melting glaciers...

I am seeing a God emerging from the probability of His being or not being, between the light and the dark. And yes, I have seen Him—with the same physical attributes as mine, with the very image I had been holding of Him in my mind, and with an immense light pouring out of Him. He is almighty. I didn’t want to blink; I wanted to be fully sure that He was still there, that I was not daydreaming. Yes, He is there—perhaps waiting for me to speak. Should I start speaking? But what would I say? Doesn’t He already know everything in my mind? And if He knows, would He still be interested in speaking with me, in hearing what I am seeking? If He asks for my wish—do I truly know what my deepest wish has been all my life? After all, wishes never end. So, should I ask for a final wish that could sort out all of my problems? But wait—what are my problems? Do I even know them at all? Is there any problem at all? In this way, I become confused about the very purpose for which I have been calling my ...